Talk:Birds Aren't Real

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Birds Aren't Real article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Birds Low‑importance

Birds Aren't Real is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Birds Aren't Real appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Birds Aren't Real?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Birds Aren't Real.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Canadianerk (talk) 10:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

CAPTION TEXT GOES HERE

... that Birds Aren't Real?
- ALT1: ... that the Birds Aren't Real movement claims that the United States government exterminated birds and replaced them with drones?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Presidential cabinets

Created by Milowent (talk) and Buidhe (talk). Nominated by Buidhe (talk) at 22:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

QPQ done and article just about long enough. New enough and well-sourced, no detection of copyvio. ALT0 is more hooky, but ALT1 is more "serious". Good to go, anyways. Juxlos (talk) 04:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted to Prep 6

Satirical?

The first sentence says "Birds Drones Aren't Real is a satirical conspiracy theory". Well the movement denies to be satirical, and they call this label "offensive". Should we keep the "satirical" word in the definition? The fact that some media and observers call it satirical does not make it satirical imho. Topjur01 (talk) 05:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The creator has explicitly said it was a "satirical joke I made up in 3 minutes with some friends". He considers it to be obvious if "people dig into the movement for even 5 or 10 minutes and actually watch our videos. We insert lots of jokes and winks to it as a joke". I'd recommend you watch the Vice video that interviewed the creator (where he breaks character) if you need a source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK1dXuMEpT0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:A994:9500:9DB5:A7A8:1DE:57BA (talk) 13:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Topjur01, yes we should call it satirical. It doesn't matter what McIndoe, the zoomer activist Andy Kaufman, says about it at other times, we have solid sourcing for it.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
yes it does matter. We should also include if we have a source the statement that the founder also denies that it's satirical. Otherwise claiming that it is satirical is original research. It is not the purpose of Wikipedia to approve or support one theory or the other, it is the purpose of Wikipedia to present sourced information 193.149.173.67 (talk) 14:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're saying birds are real? Heretic. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:45, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Watchers of the page may be interested that there is now a userbox for this:

This editor knows that Birds Aren't Real.

(t · c) buidhe 16:00, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sort-of-serious point here: from what I can tell, it's fairly obvious this is a satirical movement, but some of the sources seem to write about it from some in-universe style, pretending to take it seriously. IDK what to do with this information, but just thought I'd mention it. —AFreshStart (talk) 16:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We can't use the Vice source because Peter has spoken genuinely about it saying that the video is a deep fake and is a demonic deep state hit job. See https://www.instagram.com/p/CYkM3daBVEH/. You may think it's obvious and deep state media may claim that the movement is satire, but of course they would. MurrayScience (talk) 11:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated question, how do you get the “birds aren’t real” userbox to show up on your user page? AmazingFerret (talk) 04:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]